Safety in the field is an efficiency factor
Blog

Why safety is not an additional issue, but efficiency factor number one

02.12.2025

A technician travels alone to a remote location to fix a malfunction. Everything is going according to plan – until there is suddenly no more radio contact. Minutes turn into hours. It is only late that someone in the service center realizes that help is needed.

Such situations are not unique. According to DGUV around 40% of all service technicians regularly work alone; rescue workers need an average of 20 minutes longer to be on site in the event of an emergency.

Working alone = everyday life – but not a calculation error

Whether network operators, public utilities or industry – individual deployments are part of the routine. Nevertheless, security risks are often underestimated or dealt with administratively instead of integrating them organizationally and digitally.

The German Occupational Health and Safety Act (ArbSchG) and DGUV Rule 112-139 oblige companies to provide technical and organizational protection for single workers. Paper processes, Excel lists or telephone check-ins are no longer enough for this – they are prone to errors and slow down processes.

When safety slows down processes – or speeds them up

Many operational safety concepts focus on control, not efficiency. Missing feedback, outdated plans or inaccurate location data not only create risks, but also lost time in use.

This is where the paradox emerges: The more security effort is created manually, the slower teams get – and the more uncertain it becomes in an emergency.

Digital solutions such as Entry solve this dilemma. They do not make security an additional step, but an integrated part of the process.

Safety by Design: Safety as part of the workflow

1. Visibility

Using the Entry Dashboard, operations managers can see in real time where technicians are and whether check-ins or feedback are missing.
In the event of discrepancies, predefined processes, such as alerting or escalating to the control center, automatically take effect.

2. Automation

Deadman switching, timers and emergency call mechanisms run in the background and reduce sources of human error. An alarm is not forgotten – it is triggered when there is no response.

3. Transparency

All processes, from check-in to feedback, are documented in the dashboard. This creates traceability and simplifies the legally required risk assessment.

Digital support with Entry

With the Entry app and the Conntac dashboard, security and service processes can be combined:

Result: More security, less administration, more efficiency. What used to be mandatory is now becoming a competitive advantage.

Conclusion: Security creates trust – and efficiency

Safety in the field is not an insurance policy, but a productivity factor.
Digital solutions such as Entry show that occupational safety and efficiency are not mutually exclusive – they are interdependent.
Integrating security processes not only protects people, but also time, data, and resources.

Learn more

Download the white paper Safety in the field down or start Entry for free.

Frequently Asked Questions about Lone Working in Field Service

What qualifies as lone working?

Lone working applies when people perform tasks without immediate proximity to others and help cannot be organized quickly. This often affects service technicians at remote locations.

What obligations arise from the German Occupational Safety Act and DGUV Rule 112-139 for lone working?

Employers must assess risks, define suitable protective measures, ensure reliable communication, and plan effective emergency response chains. Measures must be implemented effectively and documented.

What must a risk assessment for lone working include?

It should describe the task, location, risks, protective measures, communication paths, alerting, and escalation. Responsibilities and regular review cycles should also be defined.

How does a digital man-down function work?

A sensor or timer monitors movement and response. If a check-in is missed, the system triggers a pre-alert and escalates to an emergency call with location information if needed.

Is an app sufficient, or is a certified personal emergency signal system required?

This depends on the task and risk level. For higher risks, a certified personal emergency signal system may be required. In other cases, an app with reliable alerting, location data, and proof of events may be sufficient. The risk assessment is decisive.

What evidence should solutions for lone working provide?

Typical records include timestamps of check-ins, location references, alert histories, escalation steps, involved roles, and documented actions. These records support audits and effectiveness checks.

How does Entry support the protection of lone workers?

Entry provides digital check-ins, man-down features, automated alerts, and a central dashboard for control centers. Safety and job coordination work together, reducing manual effort.

How are emergencies detected and escalated in Entry?

If a response is missing or a manual emergency call is triggered, the app creates an alert with context data. Responsible teams are notified, escalation chains are activated, and all steps are logged.

Why is Safety by Design an efficiency factor in field service?

Safety features are built into daily workflows and run automatically. This creates clarity, reduces errors, eases the load on control centers, and shortens response times in emergencies.

Photo of Johanna Kugler
Johanna Kugler

Content Marketing Manager

Become a Conntac Insider

Subscribe to our LinkedIn newsletter The Conntac Chronicles to receive relevant insights and perspectives on current topics and challenges in the field of modern service solutions.

Woman high fiving another person